<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Science Creative Quarterly &#187; bill hick the science prick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scq.ubc.ca/category/bill-hick-the-science-prick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scq.ubc.ca</link>
	<description>Science writing of any and all connotations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BILL HICK, SCIENCE PRICK CRUSHES CONTEST ENTRANTS WITH WICKED IMPUNITY</title>
		<link>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-crushes-contest-entrants-with-wicked-impunity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-crushes-contest-entrants-with-wicked-impunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ericfeezell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hick the science prick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-crushes-contest-entrants-with-wicked-impunity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(In reference to this) Bill Hick, I have a question. What’s up with the Mentos in a Coke bottle thing. Is that like a miracle kind of thing. I swear, when I did it once, I saw the face of jesus in the explosion that followed. cheers, Henry from Alabama Dear Henry from Alabama, What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><i>(In reference to <a href="http://www.scq.ubc.ca/questions-questions-for-a-prick/">this</a>)</i></center></p>
<p>Bill Hick,</p>
<p>I have a question. What’s up with the Mentos in a Coke bottle thing. Is that like a miracle kind of thing. I swear, when I did it once, I saw the face of jesus in the explosion that followed.</p>
<p>cheers,</p>
<p>Henry from Alabama</p>
<p><i>Dear Henry from Alabama,</p>
<p>What is it with you Bible Belters? Always seeing Jesus in toaster strudels and newspaper kiosks. If I had a nickel for every time one of you southerners tried to stuff the square peg of religion into the round hole of scientific discourse, I’d probably have about 50 times your annual adjusted gross income—which probably isn’t saying much, admittedly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really no miracle at all, Henry. It just has to do with the porous surface (think: your icky face) of unflavored, or mint, Mentos offering sufficient nucleation sites for the creation of carbon dioxide bubbles—bubbles which become the catalyst for an intense pressural  increase and cause the impacted water molecules to quickly break away from one another. The result: a geyser of aspartame-filled proportions—almost as powerful as the geyser of your utter dorkiness. In fact, a more accurate definition of “miracle” might be your ability to pin-point a vagina on a female human.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really have the time to answer questions as rudimentary as this one, and so will be sending you a bill for the time taken. Just remember: One hundred dollars an hour is a bargain for access to my insurmountable intellect. (If you are in need of monetary perspective, consider the amount you paid for your inflatable girlfriend, then multiply it by twenty.)</p>
<p>Love,<br />
Bill Hick,<br />
Science Prick</i></p>
<p><center>****</center></p>
<p>Mr. Hick,</p>
<p>I recently learned that some people will sneeze when they see bright light. About 17 to 35 percent of the population do it, say my sources. What kind of portable light source can I use to test this sneeze reflex? I will strictly do it as a party trick, promise.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Hristina</p>
<p><i>Dear Hristina,</p>
<p>First, let me just say that you must attend some rather lame parties. At the types of soirées I normally frequent, if you sneeze on another guest, it had better the result of a violent and involuntary bodily reaction to some killer Colombian. (Not advocating drug use, but I sometimes hang with a rough and tumble set.) I would venture that you probably play Pin the Tail On the Donkey and Twister at these events. Pretty weak—unless there happen to be live equines and stripping involved (respectively or irrespectively).</p>
<p>Anyway, I just looked through my reference materials and discovered that your numbers (17 to 35 percent of the population) are a direct match to the figures provided by the ultimate dispensary of knowledge &#8230; Wikipedia. This makes me even more skeptical than my scientific nature would normally warrant, and I can&#8217;t help but feel you are trying to set me up. Do you think Bill Hick would actually rely on such a specious source of knowledge (even though he just happened to check it, just this once)? Do you not realize you are dealing with a man who possesses more doctoral degrees than Kool Keith and Chaffey Community College combined?</p>
<p>Hristina, I suggest you go stare at the sun for, I don&#8217;t know, the next half hour. After that, do your best to locate a battery-powered flash light, and then head to that party posthaste. I&#8217;d estimate you have a 17 to 35 percent chance of striking up a conversation with a bowl of chips.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Bill Hick,<br />
Science Prick</i></p>
<p><center>****</center></p>
<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p>This isn’t actually a question, but I was wondering if plants could talk it would be pretty noisy during the fall season.</p>
<p>Jill</p>
<p><i>Dear Jill,</p>
<p>I really never thought I’d say this, but I hope God is real.</p>
<p>The universe simply must have a plan for people of your ilk. I’m not sure exactly what that plan may be, but I cannot in good conscience continue my mortal struggle believing otherwise. Your particular brand of crude idiocy calls for some barbarous brand of divine punishment.</p>
<p>That said, yes, I suppose if plants could talk it would be pretty noisy during the fall season, like some sad chorus of ensuing death—as cacophonous and insufferable as a moaning collective of crusty geriatrics begging the triage nurse for the necessary amount of demerol to put them out of their arthritic misery. Something like that, maybe, except higher-pitched.</p>
<p>I’d conjecture it could be similarly noisy in spring and summer, when most plants are just beginning to develop. We all know how loud and obnoxious children are—just imagine, talking plant children. How awful. And perhaps worse yet, they’d be everywhere, they’d be green, and they’d emit natural allergens.</p>
<p>Anyway, at least winter would be pretty relaxing because all the stupid talking plants WOULD BE DEAD.</p>
<p>I can’t believe I just answered that. Here’s to new lows.</p>
<p>Yours,<br />
Bill Hick<br />
Science Prick</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-crushes-contest-entrants-with-wicked-impunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QUESTIONS! QUESTIONS FOR A PRICK!</title>
		<link>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/questions-questions-for-a-prick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/questions-questions-for-a-prick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>thesciencecreativequarterly</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hick the science prick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scq.ubc.ca/questions-questions-for-a-prick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Science Creative Quarterly is seeking wondrous, thought provoking, and potentially slightly silly science questions. These we hope to present to our esteem Bill Hick, the Science Prick, who in turn will attempt his best to answer them in due course. As well, know that a little meat with regards to the questions submitted wouldn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Science Creative Quarterly is seeking wondrous, thought provoking, and potentially slightly silly science questions.  These we hope to present to our esteem <i><a href="http://www.scq.ubc.ca/category/bill-hick-the-science-prick/">Bill Hick, the Science Prick</a>,</i> who in turn will attempt his best to answer them in due course.</p>
<p>As well, know that a little meat with regards to the questions submitted wouldn&#8217;t hurt.  And to attract such queries, we would like to make this request for questions our October monthly book contest.  This time around, the prize is <i><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Edwina-Dinosaur-Didnt-Know-Extinct/dp/0786837489">Edwina, The Dinosaur Who Didn&#8217;t Know She Was Extinct</a></i> by Mo Willems.  This seems just about right, since Edwina is admittedly the complete opposite of Bill Hick the Science Prick in almost every conceivable way.  </p>
<p><center><img src='http://www.scq.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/51nwr8qnxnl_aa240_.jpg' alt='51nwr8qnxnl_aa240_.jpg' /></center></p>
<p>Please submit questions to tscq@interchange.ubc.ca.  Submissions deadline is midnight, October 31st, 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/questions-questions-for-a-prick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BILL HICK, SCIENCE PRICK, SERVES SUCKAS ON THE BLOCK</title>
		<link>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-serves-suckas-on-the-block/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-serves-suckas-on-the-block/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>feezellbrothers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hick the science prick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scq.ubc.ca/?p=707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Hick, Hi! My name is Sammy, and I live in Alaska with my mama, papa, and puppy dog, Puppy. I am only six, so my mama typed this for me. You are one of my favorite people. Ever! There&#8217;s this thing that we see up here a lot called the aurora borealis. (That [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Hick,</p>
<p>Hi! My name is Sammy, and I live in Alaska with my mama, papa, and puppy dog, Puppy. I am only six, so my mama typed this for me. You are one of my favorite people. Ever!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s this thing that we see up here a lot called the aurora borealis. (That looks like a hard word to spell! Wow.) My papa says it has something to do with electrons (another really hard word!), but I have a secret: I think it&#8217;s heaven.</p>
<p>What do you think, Mr. Hick?</p>
<p>Love,</p>
<p>Sammy Davis<br />
Fairbanks, Alaska</p>
<p><i>Dear Sammy,</p>
<p>Sammy, I one-hundred-percent agree with you! Those are indeed the lights of God&#8217;s kingdom that you see coruscating on the northern horizon every few months. You can tell your papa I said so, too.</p>
<p>Now, let me give you some sound advice: Look long and hard on those lights, Sammy Davis, because that&#8217;s as close as you&#8217;re ever going to get to heaven, given the fact that you decided to convert to Judaism while doped up in the hospital after that auto wreck. Say hi to the rest of the Rat Pack for me, would you?</p>
<p>Puppy is a great name for a dog, by the way. Very imaginative. I can only dream what you&#8217;ll call your first-born child, should you ever be unlucky enough to have one.</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Bill Hick, Science Prick</i>     </p>
<p><center>****</center></p>
<p>Dear Bill Hick,</p>
<p>My stupid friend Marcus told me that bowling balls float. I said no way. He said yeah-huh. We made a bet and then I threw my dad&#8217;s bowling ball into the pool and it sank. But Marcus won&#8217;t pay me because he says he saw something on <i>your</i> show that showed a bowling ball floating in a fish tank or something dumb like that. But we both saw it. The ball sank. Would you settle this, and tell Marcus to pay me my stupid five dollars?</p>
<p>Vince Anderson<br />
Ventura, California</p>
<p><i>Dear Vince,</p>
<p>This is obviously a question of density. Or, perhaps more appropriately, denseness.</p>
<p>I could go on and on about density, buoyancy, water-weight displacement, and the like, but you don&#8217;t come off as terribly intelligent, so let&#8217;s keep it basic and just stick with what you need to know:</p>
<p>Your dad is a bowler. Given this fact, it follows that he likely has a severe drinking problem, and is therefore more prone to abusing you verbally and physically. How do you think he&#8217;s going to react when he sees his bowling ball at the bottom of the swimming pool? My guess is badly. So you have to ask yourself the same question I am faced with each time I receive back-alley fellatio: Was it really worth the five dollars? Maybe. Maybe not.</p>
<p>If I were you, I would sleep with one eye open, Vince, lest you end up sleeping next to that bowling ball.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Bill Hick, Science Prick</i></p>
<p><center>****</center></p>
<p>Dear Bill Hack, Science Quack,</p>
<p>I am Dr. Sachin Vishnakyra, and I write to you from the engineering department of the California Institute of Science and Technology. Not long ago, my lab associates and I inquired with you requesting your &#8220;expert&#8221; consultation on a certain scientific matter. You did not reply, however. It is in the spirit of scientific endeavor that I contact you a second time.</p>
<p>Recently, my group discovered that the quantum-confined Stark effect may be responsible for the reduced modal gain observed in optoelectronic devices utilizing InGaN quantum wells.</p>
<p>If the electron and hole wave functions are indeed spatially separated under low injection conditions, their low overlap integral explains the gain reduction. However, we do not yet understand what effect this spatial separation will have on the electroluminescence properties of the quantum wells at high injection levels. </p>
<p>From one &#8220;scientist&#8221; to another, I ask: do you care to elaborate?</p>
<p>On behalf of my lab partners, I look forward to benefiting from your vast knowledge on this subject.</p>
<p>Sachin Vishnakyra, Ph.D.<br />
Postdoctoral Researcher<br />
California Institute of Science and Technology</p>
<p><i>Dear Dr. Vishnakyra,</p>
<p>Forgive me for neglecting to address your previous inquiry. It was received, but disregarded nevertheless, along the lines that it was nothing more than a juvenile attempt at discrediting me as a &#8220;scientist.&#8221; Obviously, however, you feel the need to press the issue. So, to paraphrase Wyatt Earp: You called down the thunder, well now you&#8217;ve got it, mister.</p>
<p>Any researcher worth his salt would already have concluded that the quantum-confined Stark effect is the result of the piezoelectric fields present at the interfaces between the InGaN quantum wells and the GaN barriers. These piezoelectric fields cause the quantum wells to be triangular in shape, thus separating the electron and hole wave functions and leading to a reduced overlap integral. No shit, right?</p>
<p>So, under higher injection levels, the shapes of the quantum wells begin to level out and the effective band-gap in the material is increased. Therefore, the electroluminescence will experience a blue shift under these high injection levels.  </p>
<p>Boo-yah! I feel this answers your question quite sufficiently. Now, if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I have matters of greater scientific consequence to attend to; namely, optimizing yo mama&#8217;s modal gain until she reaches threshold. After that, &#8220;in the spirit of scientific endeavor,&#8221; I think I&#8217;ll increase my injection level until I completely populate her triangular well.</p>
<p>Served.</p>
<p>Bill Hick, Science Prick</p>
<p>P.S. Yo mama&#8217;s like an overlap integral: she so fat, she overlap a ground-water well!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-serves-suckas-on-the-block/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BILL HICK, SCIENCE PRICK, HOUSES ON FOOLS</title>
		<link>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-houses-on-fools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-houses-on-fools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ericfeezell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hick the science prick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scq.ubc.ca/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Hick, I&#8217;m thirteen years old, writing from Atlanta, Georgia. My friend has a German Sheppard named Sparky. Sparky is a neutered male, but that doesn&#8217;t stop him from sometimes demonstrating some pretty gross sexual behavior. What I mean is: He likes to hump my leg. He also likes to hump my friend&#8217;s leg, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Hick,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thirteen years old, writing from Atlanta, Georgia. My friend has a German Sheppard named Sparky. Sparky is a neutered male, but that doesn&#8217;t stop him from sometimes demonstrating some pretty gross sexual behavior. What I mean is: He likes to hump my leg. He also likes to hump my friend&#8217;s leg, and the legs of a lot of our other male buddies. So my question is: Can a dog be gay?</p>
<p>Billy Greeling<br />
Atlanta, Georgia</p>
<p><i>Dear Billy,</p>
<p>Well this is a strange question, Billy. At first, I figured you were going to inquire why spayed or neutered animals continue to display sexual tendencies even after receiving said surgical procedures, but now I see that you are just being an uptight bigot.</p>
<p>Ask yourself a question, Billy: What does is matter to you who Sparky likes to hump? Animals, like humans, derive pleasure and satisfaction from a variety of sources; but, unlike humans, animals are not so worried about what their stupid little fourteen-year-old friends think about them or whatever, and so are not prone to deny themselves that which makes them happy. I think you need to take a good, long look in the mirror and sort out some pretty obvious insecurities, young man. My diploma doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;psychiatrist&#8221; on it, just as I&#8217;m </i>sure<i> your forehead doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;closet dog fornicator&#8221; written in 48-point, bold print across it. Grow up (and get out of the South &#8211; I hear bestiality is a pretty serious offense down there).</p>
<p>Freak.</p>
<p>Bill Hick, Science Prick</i>     </p>
<p><center>****</center></p>
<p>Dear Bill Hick, Science Prick,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m seven and I love your show! I also love your website! How did you become so smart? Sorry, that&#8217;s not my question. My question is: What is the Curly Hollis effect, exactly? Someone in my science class says it&#8217;s what makes toilets swirl when they flush, but then this other kid, Alex Nelson, who&#8217;s a real nerd, says it&#8217;s not that at all, and that it has to do with the way stuff bounces off the surface of the earth in the top and bottom parts of the earth or something. I hope that makes sense.</p>
<p>I really love your show!</p>
<p>Stephanie Holcomb<br />
Fort Worth, Texas</p>
<p><i>Dear Stephanie,</p>
<p>You neanderthal. Let me explain a few things:</p>
<p>1.	It&#8217;s not the &#8220;Curly Hollis effect&#8221;, as you so retardedly stated, but the &#8220;Coriolis effect.&#8221; The Curly Hollis effect actually originated on your mother&#8217;s side of the family. It is the diminishing repercussion on the intellect experienced by the offspring of women impregnated by male relatives. (Who&#8217;s your daddy! No, seriously, do you know?)</p>
<p>2.	Your &#8220;nerd&#8221; classmate, Alex Nelson, is correct, and &#8220;someone in [your] science class&#8221; is even dumber than you are. The Coriolis effect refers to an object&#8217;s inclination to deflect (or spin) one way or another in a given rotating frame of reference, as first demonstrated many years ago by Léon Foucault and his fantastic pendulum, which I won&#8217;t even attempt to get into with the likes of you. As far as the whole toilet thing goes, let me just say I&#8217;m flabbergasted your family has indoor plumbing.</p>
<p>3.	&#8220;Top and bottom parts of the earth&#8221;? Say what you will about public education, but that is simply inexcusable terminology. How old are you, seven?</p>
<p>4.	You should have been aborted.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing.</p>
<p>Bill Hick, Science Prick</i></p>
<p><center>****</center></p>
<p>Dear Bill Hick,</p>
<p>Hello. My name is Joshua. I am thirteen. I don&#8217;t get very good grades all the time, but I really like science. It is my strongest subject. (I got a C last semester!) Anyway, I know this isn&#8217;t really a &#8220;science&#8221; question, but do you think I have any chance of getting in to a good school and becoming a scientist like you? I hope so.</p>
<p>Your biggest fan,</p>
<p>Joshua Greene<br />
Fresno, California</p>
<p><i>Dear Joshua,</p>
<p>Did you know that if you rearrange the letters in &#8220;scientist&#8221; a very certain way, you can spell the word &#8220;moron&#8221;?</p>
<p>That should keep you busy for the next forty years. Good luck in sanitation!</p>
<p>Bill Hick, Science Prick</i></p>
<p><center>****</center></p>
<p>Dear Bill Hick,</p>
<p>My name is Veronica and I am writing from Omaha, Nebraska. I am mother to three beautiful, God-fearing daughters, and wife to a wonderful, hard-working husband. I am quite humbled each day when I realize the gifts which God has given me.</p>
<p>Recently, in Lincoln, you held what many presumed would be a family-oriented lecture covering various topics. Imagine my dismay &#8211; and that of all other pious Nebraskans in attendance &#8211; when you veered from otherwise benign material and recklessly refocused your attention toward the opening passage from the Good Book (Genesis 1:1):</p>
<p><i>In [the] beginning, God created the heavens and earth.</i></p>
<p>After reading this quote, you went on to make many blasphemous remarks insinuating that God, in fact, did not create &#8220;the universe&#8221;, as you so arrogantly called it, but that some sort of large &#8220;bang&#8221; or some such crock was the actual progenitor to all of life as we know it. In short, Mr. Hick, you contradicted the very essence of the Bible.</p>
<p>So, Mr. Science Prick, on behalf of countless other offended individuals, my question is this: Who are you to contradict the Bible? It might not mean much to a man of your ilk, but I will tell you quite gravely, sir, that for many good Americans, the Bible is TRUTH. Not science, the BIBLE! How dare you challenge THE TRUTH!</p>
<p>Shame on you, Bill Hick! I will pray for your soul.</p>
<p>Veronica Hastings<br />
Omaha, Nebraska</p>
<p><i>Dear Veronica,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but agree with you on this one. I was out of line, insensitive to the beliefs of others, and, most importantly, I was sinful. Please forgive my transgression, and know that I am eternally grateful that you have offered to pray for me.</p>
<p>In fact, in the spirit of quid pro quo, I bestow a gift upon you, Veronica. You will soon receive in the mail a pair of brand new crutches, as God is tired of your use of Him in this fashion. So do me a fucking favor: Find some free will, then run back to church and tell God you don&#8217;t need Him anymore. Why? Because you just got HOUSED ON by Bill Hick, the Science Prick. I am your god now, Veronica.</p>
<p>Moded, biotch!</p>
<p>Bill Hick, Science Prick</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scq.ubc.ca/bill-hick-science-prick-houses-on-fools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

