Skip to the content
The Science Creative Quarterly
  • home
  • about (the SCQ)
  • image (bank)
  • submit
  • home
  • about (the SCQ)
  • image (bank)
  • submit
  1. Home
  2. creative
  3. BAD SCIENCE: THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND EXAGGERATED AND FALSE RESEARCH

BAD SCIENCE: THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND EXAGGERATED AND FALSE RESEARCH

February 7, 2012
creative visuals
JenRhee

Click on image for full size.

– – –

Note that the original graphic lives at http://www.clinicalpsychology.net/bad-science/

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
creative visuals
  • IT’S A DEBATABLE CHRISTMAS
  • ONE MUST PUBLISH

Related posts

  • MARINE MOLLUSC (A HAIKU ON APLYSIA CALIFORNICA)
    June 4, 2008
  • THE ABRAMS’ STORMTROOPER AXIOM
    April 1, 2013
  • THE LAB CULTURE: A TRUE SCIENTIFIC HORROR STORY
    October 14, 2016
  • EPISODE 2: UNDERGRADS
    October 31, 2014

The Science Creative Quarterly (SCQ) is not a quarterly, but instead publishes new material at a non-linear rate. Currently, it is sleeping and in a sort of stasis (turpor?) It used to seek science writing of any genre, and your contribution would have involved checking out our submissions guidelines.

The Science Creative Quarterly (SCQ) has a single print edition so far (half SCQ pieces, and half fake science journal – see here for more details).

© The Science Creative Quarterly.